You might think that by hiring a patent attorney, and paying anything from $5,000-$13,000 to have a non-provisional patent application drafted and the filed at the patent office that you’d be guaranteed to get the best patent protection you can get.

Unfortunately that’s just often not the case.

As someone who comes from both a creative and an academic background, I can tell you, I’ve seen some bizarre work from some patent attorneys that leaves me scratching my head. Don’t get me wrong- a really good patent attorney is potentially worth their weight in gold. It’s just that a lot of patent attorneys really struggle when it comes to working and isolating the best possible strategy or strategies to get you the best patent protection possible.

The bottom line is this:

You need to take patent attorneys off the pedestal.

It can be very tempting to HOPE that your patent attorney is going to do an amazing/perfect job on your patenting- after all, you paid them a lot of money. But the truth is, because you don’t really understand patenting at the moment, the belief that your patent attorney will do an amazing job could be wishful thinking due to you not understanding the process and finding it daunting. In other words, because you may not have a clue what’s going on, it’s just EASIER to hope/assume that everything will be done right.

But as I said, that’s often not the case.

Think about it- in Football, (not American Football, but British/world football), there must be THOUSANDS of football managers of various teams, at various levels, throughout the world. But there are only about 15 ‘special’ managers- ones that are so good that it almost GUARANTEES winning a trophy or getting into the Champions League if you hire them. Think about that- THOUSANDS of football managers worldwide, and yet only about 15 truly BRILLIANT ones.

Now think about it with patent attorneys- how many patent attorneys are there? There are around 45,000 in America alone. How many of those THOUSANDS of patent attorneys are truly BRILLIANT at getting you the best patent protection possible?

I know it may seem daunting (or even scary) to think you could pay thousands of dollars, and then not get the job done right by a patent attorney. But we have to face reality, and deal with the reality of the situation.

I’ll explain to you what I think is the SOLUTION in the tab below.

*Before I give you the solution to getting a Bad Patent from a Patent Attorney, if you haven’t seen it mentioned in any of the other videos you’ve seen, I’ve designed the LightSpeed PerfectPatent™ service so that, instead of having to wait 1-3 years to get your official patent office results, you can get them as quickly as within 18 days of us filing your full patent application, and, as standard, within 2 months. This changes your patenting (and invention) journey completely, so check that service out, at step 3 of The Inventor’s Journey™.  You should see a tab for that below. And if you don’t believe this is possible, it 100% is, and check the reviews from inventors who got this service and got their invention allowed for patent in just WEEKS rather than years.

————————–

There are two aspects to how it can be made as likely as possible that you get the best possible patent protection on your invention. One aspect is on our side. The other aspect is on your side.

ON OUR SIDE:

I will be implementing an extra level of checking/screening to check the patenting strategy (and execution of the patenting strategy) in your non-provisional patent application is configured perfectly, to get you the best possible patent protection for your invention.

The way this will work is that one of our patent practitioners, (who may well be a patent attorney), will take care of your patenting. This will include deciding on the patenting strategy, and drafting your non-provisional patent application, to try to EXECUTE that patent strategy. However, there will be another patent practitioner who’s job it will be to screen the work done by your main patent practitioner. The main focus of this will be:

• To check whether the patenting strategy the main patent practitioner has decided on is correct
• To check whether that patenting strategy has any flaws in the claim language, (to make sure the main patent practitioner hasn’t made mistakes that could or will limit your patenting strategy
• To check whether there are any OTHER patenting strategies, (ie different claiming strategies), that could be valuable and that the main patent practitioner has missed.

This work could be done by one, or more than one, patent practitioner. And it’s highly unlikely, in the future, that the main patent practitioner will know the identity of the patent practitioner that does the screening. This keeps things clinical.

Whilst a lot of this work (ie the screening) will initially be done by me, in the future, it will be done by other patent practitioner(s), possibly ones who are considered extremely skilled and able when it comes to the art of getting the best possible patent protection for the invention.

This extra level of screening is a very good thing from your point of view.

ON YOUR SIDE:

On your side, the key thing is for you to be able to understand the CLAIMS that our patent practitioner drafts for your non-provisional patent application.

The CLAIMS of a patent application are the part where your invention is DEFINED in a single sentence, in patenting language.  By understanding the CLAIMS, you effectively understand PATENTING, because the CLAIMS are by far the most important part of the patent application. Not only do they define what you are CLAIMING for patent, (ie what your patent application is requesting a patent for), but they also define the scope of the PATENT SEARCH that the examiner who examines your patent application at the patent office does.

By understanding the CLAIMS, it means you yourself can do a bit of checking/screening of the patent practitioner’s work. You might be thinking that it’s too tough for you to do, but there are a couple of resources I have that will allow you to learn this very quickly. I think these will be very helpful. Here they are:

• Check the RESOURCES tab of this Deadly Mistake. The first video you’ll see there is called PATENTING CRASH COURSE. This has insanely high like ration on Youtube, and it may still be the best video I have to quickly get you into an understanding of CLAIMS. The key is it shows a real life example where I intervened in the patenting of an inventor’s invention, and I actually go through the claim and the problem on-screen. By seeing the problem, you’ll most light years ahead in your understanding of CLAIMS, and therefore your understanding of PATENTING.
• Your next resource will be any videos I have where I actually go through claiming, on-screen, showing you a claim as I build it or correct it. I’ve done quite a few videos relevant to this, so always feel free to check our Youtube channel, or, if you go ahead and get an Inventor’s Journey account and come aboard SHIINE ENTERPRISE, then even on the free trial, you’ll get access to the Patents Untranslated™ video series page. On that page, you can just search for ‘CLAIMS’, and watch any videos tagged for that.
• Similarly to option 2, I have an actual program I created, called iPerfectPending™. It’s about how to get perfect patent pending status with a provisional patent application, but it does that by teaching about your CLAIM 1. That would be the best resource for you to learn about CLAIMS because it has around 15 videos that you can just sit through and watch, all in one program, accessible right in front of you. You can get iPerfectPending™ as part of the PATENT PENDING PACKAGE programs for as little as a $69 payment today. (Full no questions asked 30 day money-back guarantee included). If you want to buy that, get it from here.

I’m looking forward to helping you with your patenting and hope you’ll choose SHIINE® and The Inventor’s Journey™ to get your patenting done.